Proyecto Europeo » Erasmo Navarrete

THIRD MEETING EVALUATION REPORT

Erasmo Navarrete — Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:51:56 +0000

THE EVALUATION REPORT OF THE THIRD MEETING ON “ACTIVE CITIZENSHIP IN EUROPE”
The third partner meeting of the project “Active Citizenship in Europe” was held on
November 3 and 4 in Bordeaux, France. The meeting was hosted by one of the partner
organizations, IFAID Aquitaine. Four partner organizations from four countries (Germany,
France, Spain and the Netherlands) took part in the meeting.

The third meeting included a brief presentation of the project for the new participants,
presentation of the English course on European citizenship carried out by IFAID Aquitaine, the
presentation of the online course made by Centro del Profesorado Bollulos-Valverde, the
workshop organized by Dissens, and discussions about the documentation of the project,
possible dissemination activities and dates and contents of the last meeting in Berlin.

Read the full document here

Sexuality and gender rights education with children

Erasmo Navarrete — Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:42:08 +0000

The youth organisation IFM-SEI has developed a manual for Human Rights Education with children on sexuality and gender rights called Rainbow Resources.The publication supports young people to facilitate human rights education with children on issues such as identity, gender equality, sexual diversity, heteronormativity, homophobic bullying or love and families. Follow the link and you can download the manual for free in Spanish, French, English, German and Lithuanian:

http://www.ifm-sei.org/toolbox/rainbow-resources

SUMMARY OF SURVEY ON EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP

Erasmo Navarrete — Tue, 23 Sep 2014 20:53:36 +0000

“Conscious of its spiritual and moral heritage, the Union is founded on the indivisible, universal values of human dignity, freedom, equality and solidarity; it is based on the principles of democracy and the rule of law. It places the individual at the heart of its activities, by establishing the citizenship of the Union and by creating an area of freedom, security and justice. (PREAMBLE, Charter Of Fundamental Rights Of The European Union)”.

By means of this project, Active Citizenship in Europe, we aim at disseminating the contents of European Citizenship Rights, so that they can be acknowledged and enjoyed by all European citizens. It goes without saying that enjoyment of these rights entails responsibilities and duties with regard to other persons, to the human community and to future generations.

One of the first actions we decided to take was to design a survey in order to assess how aware Europeans are of their citizenship rights and whether we exercise them. The aim was, consequently, to establish training strategies to acknowledge and implement those rights. The survey was designed by IFAID Aquitaine trainees (Marilou BREDA, Raïssa MAGRONDJI, Eléa OLIVIER, Alix VAVAL, and Johanna VOIGT) following the specifications and contributions of all members. Once the draft was revised and corrected, the final outcome was issued and each of the participants implemented it with a target group in their countries and in their national language. Following that stage, a report was written and recommendations made.

You can download the full report by clicking on the link below.

Level of knowledge and level of exercise of the citizens’ European rights.

SECOND MEETING EVALUATION REPORT

Erasmo Navarrete — Tue, 23 Sep 2014 20:01:01 +0000

With the aim of the project to develop strategies and initiative to help raise
awareness among adults of their rights as EU citizens including Human Rights, and
encourage them exercise their rights, the second meeting was held on May 22 and 23 in
Waalre, the Netherlands. The meeting was hosted by the partner organization SECMO. Four
participating organizations from four countries (Germany, France, Spain and the
Netherlands) took part in the meeting.
The contecnt of the second meeting included the revision of the activities performed
between the two meetings, the presentation of the questionnaire designed and conducted
by the partner organization IFAID, possible actions to be taken by participating
organizations, confirming dates for the next meetings and preparing a draft for the interim
report. After the meeting, an evaluation questionnaire was designed by SECMO based on the
content of the meeting.
The questionnaire sought for responses regarding participants’ views on the activity
held by Dissens EV (Question 1), the evaluation of the period between 2 meetings
(Questions 2), presentation of the questionnaire (Question 3), discussions on possible
actions to be designed (Question 4), planning the dates for the next meetings (Question 5),
interim report (Question 6), visit to Waalre Municipality (Question 7) and overall personal
satisfaction (Questions 8, 9, 10) about the second meeting. Out of 16, 9 participants
answered and sent back the questionnaire. The distribution of the scores for each question
is given below (See Appendix for questions).

The distribution of the results represents that the participants evaluated the meeting mostly positively. The average score is 4,52 out of 5. The lowest score is 3,89, which is about the evaluation of the period between the first and second meeting. The highest score is 5 and it is related to the organization of the meeting. Overall, the participants have a satisfaction score of 4,44 of the meeting.
Based on the responses to the questionnaire on the second meeting presented above, the participants are satisfied with the presentation of the questionnaire, the possible actions to be taken regarding the results of the questionnaire, planning the next meetings, preparing the interim report, and a visit to the municipality of Waalre, and the contribution of the participants to build common ideas. As the question with the lowest score, which is about the evaluation of the period between the meetings, the possible explanation could be that participants think there were not enough equal distribution efforts by participants, or the presentation of the period during the meeting was not well-prepared. A suggestion may be that each participant organization read the minutes carefully, recognize their responsibilities and shoulder them. Strenghtening the powerful sides of the team and the project and improving the deficits will definitely be the key to the success to achieving in the aims of the project.

Appendix
Q1: Can you please evaluate “Getting to know each other /icebreaking activity (Bingo game)”
Q2: Can you please evaluate “Evaluation of the period between the two meetings.”
Q3: Can you please evaluate “Presentation of the questionnaire”
Q4: Can you please evaluate “Deciding on the actions that we will develop. Example; workshop/blog etc.”
Q5: Planning the dates and places for all coming meetings
Q6: Can you please evaluate “Talking about interim report. What information is needed there?”
Q7: Can you please evaluate “Visit to Municipality Waalre”
Q8: What is your overall satisfaction with this meeting?
Q9: Do you think that the meeting was well organized?
Q10: Do you think that at the end of the meeting, all the participants have contributed to
build common ideas?

First meeting evaluation report

Erasmo Navarrete — Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:31:15 +0000

Appendix

Q1: Presentation of partner organizations
Q2: From old project to new project (revising aims and objectives)
Q3: Discussions about “General learning about European Citizen Rights”
Q4: Discussions about “the roles of the partner organizations in the project”
Q5: Planning the dates and places for all coming meetings
Q6: Discussions about “communication of the partners”
Q7: Discussions about “task division of the partners”
Q8: What is your overall satisfaction with this meeting?
Q9: Do you think that the meeting was well organized?
Q10: Do you think that at the end of the meeting, all the participants have contributed to
build common ideas?

If you want to read the full report click here.